21810 articles – 15605 references  [version française]
HAL: hal-00597950, version 1

Detailed view  Export this paper
13th World Congress of the International Photodynamic Association, IPA 2011, Innsbruck : Autriche (2011)
Contributions of experiment designs in photodynamic therapy: photosensitizer design, treatment analysis and optimization.
Thierry Bastogne ( ) 1, 2, Loraine Tirand 2, 3, Julien Gravier 4, Denise Bechet 2, 3, Vincent Morosini 2, Marlène Pernot 2, 3, Céline Frochot 5, 6, Alain Richard 2, François Guillemin 2, 3, Muriel Barberi-Heyob 2, 3, 6
(2011-05)

Introduction One of the difficulties in the development of the photodynamic therapy (PDT) is inherent to the multidisciplinary feature of this treatment gathering mainly clinicians, physicists, biologists, and chemists. Another issue is the great number of biophysical and biochemical parameters involved in the design of new photosensitizers as well as in the in vivo application of this treatment. We present a global development approach based on the methodology and tools of experimental design. Three study cases are developed to assess to potential relevance of such an empirical model-based approach for the development of PDT. Methods & Results In a first study, an in vitro screening experimental design was carried out. The addressed question dealt with the determination of influent factors on the phototoxicity of a new photosensitizer based on quantum dots. Five factors were examined: the nature of quantum dots, the excitation light wavelength, the incubation time with cells, the photoactivable compound concentration and the fluence level. Relevance of each factor was finally estimated and compared to identify the significant parameters. In comparison with a typical factorial design, the total number of experiments (42 trials) was divided by 5. In a second study, an in vivo factorial experimental design was applied to detect potential synergic effects between four therapeutic factors: the phenotype of the cancer cell line, the food type, the nature of photosensitizer and the post-injection time, on the in vivo selectivity (cancer/normal tissue) of the tested photosensitizers. Results particularly pointed out the presence of a statistically significant synergic effect between these four factors and provided the optimal modalities to maximize the response in term of tumor-to-normal tissue ratio. In a third study, a Doehlert experimental design associated with a response surface model was used to determine the in vivo PDT modalities (photosensitizer concentration, irradiance and fluence) to both minimize the post-treatment growth rate of the tumor and maximize its growth delay. Only 13 experimental conditions were tested and the relevance of the optimized condition was corroborated by in vivo validation experiments. Conclusion These studies have confirmed the applicability and attractive contributions of experimental design techniques in the development and determination of optimal modalities of new photosensitizers in PDT. Their main advantages are to a priori organize experiments according to specific questions while minimizing the experimental cost and controlling as much as possible the experimental uncertainty.
1:  BIGS (INRIA Lorraine / IECN)
INRIA – CNRS : UMR7502
2:  Centre de recherche en automatique de Nancy (CRAN)
CNRS : UMR7039 – Université Henri Poincaré - Nancy I – Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine (INPL)
3:  Centre Alexis Vautrin
CRLCC Alexis Vautrin
4:  Laboratoire d'Electronique et des Technologies de l'Information (LETI)
CEA : DRT/LETI
5:  Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des Procédés (LRGP)
CNRS : UPR3349
6:  Médicaments Photoactivables - Photochimiothérapie (PHOTOMED)
CNRS : GDR3049 – Institut de Chimie du CNRS
Life Sciences/Quantitative Methods

Computer Science/Bioinformatics
Experiment design – Photodynamic therapy – Cancer
Attached file list to this document: 
PDF
IPA_WC_2011_v5.pdf(114.2 KB)